Tuesday 3 November 2015

SECRETS OF LOSING WEIGHT

Trying to lose weight but no success or you manage to shed some weight only for you to gain them back on? Then you  might  want to read this medical report.
 Low fat diets have been found in a latest medical research not to have a significant effect on weight-loss compared to the effect low carbohydrate diets have. According to the findings of  the study published in Medpage Today. The report says that low carbohydrate diets are more effective in a long term weight loss program  than low fat diets.
Quotes:
Low-fat diets did not lead to long-term weight loss in a large meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Researchers looked at 53 studies with more than 68,000 participants, each study lasting at least 1 year. They found that low-carbohydrate diets led to small but significantly greater weight loss than did low-fat interventions in 18 of the comparisons (weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.15 kg, 95% CI 0.52-1.79; I2=10%).

In addition, low-fat diets didn't outperform higher-fat diets when it came to weight loss (WMD 0.36 kg, 95% CI -0.66 to 1.37; I2=82%), but they did lead to greater weight loss when compared with usual diets in eight comparisons (WMD -5.41 kg, 95% CI -7.29 to -3.54, I2=68%), according to author Frank Hu, MD, PhD, at the Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, and colleagues.
They published their findings today in Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.
"Health and nutrition guidelines should cease recommending low-fat diets for weight loss in view of the clear absence of long-term efficacy when compared with other similar intensity dietary interventions," wrote the authors. "Additional research is needed to identify optimum intervention strategies for long-term weight loss and weight maintenance, including the need to look beyond variations in macronutrient composition."

According to Robert Eckel, MD, at the University of Colorado Denver, the difference of around 1 kg of weight loss between low-carb and low-fat diets is "clinically meaningless," adding that "weight loss is caloric restriction."
In an accompanying editorial, Kevin Hall, PhD, at the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, agreed that the difference that the researchers found between diets may not mean much.
"Before proclaiming the superiority of low-carbohydrate diets for the treatment of obesity, consider the magnitude of the benefit: participants prescribed low-carbohydrate diets lost only about 1 kg of additional weight after 1 year compared with those advised to consume low-fat diets," wrote Hall.

"Irrespective of the diet prescription, the overall average weight loss in trials testing interventions designed to reduce body weight was unimpressive."
Twenty of the trials included specifically enrolled patients with chronic diseases and 35 were designed specifically to compare weight loss interventions; 13 of the trials had no intended intervention for weight loss, and five were designed to maintain a certain body weight. The dietary interventions ranged from very low, where ≤10% of calories were from fat, to more moderate, with ≤30% of calories from fat.

How aggressive the intervention was also varied by study. Some interventions included pamphlets or instructions given at baseline only, while others were feeding studies in which participants were given food. Some of the studies attempted to restrict calories as well.
Hall added that it's important to consider adherence when looking at the findings, which he says probably lapsed long before the one year mark. Other studies have shown that outpatient weight-loss peaks at 6-8 months, followed by weight regain, he noted.
In trials where the intervention was specifically intended to lead to weight loss and when low-fat and higher-fat groups differed by more than 5% of calories obtained from fat, higher fat diets led to greater weight loss (18 comparisons; WMD 1.04 kg, 95% CI 0.06-2.03; I2=78%). The same was true for when the difference in serum triglycerides was at least 0.06 mmol/L (17 comparisons; 1.38 kg, 95% CI 0.50-2.25; I2=62%).
Keith Ayoob, RD, EdD, at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, added that he didn't find the results surprising, since there are lots of ways to lose weight. "That's not the real challenge. It's a challenge to keep them motivated enough to maintain compliance with a particular regimen after they lose the weight, so they can keep it off," he wrote in an email to MedPage Today. "That's why when a diet is too restrictive -- in any direction, whether it's low-carb or low-fat -- after a while people just begin to lose their mojo with the regimen."
source: http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php

No comments:

Post a Comment